Calculator

Rent vs Buy

"Rent is money down the drain" ignores what your down payment could have earned instead. This compares the honest version: your net worth if you buy, against your net worth if you rent and invest every rupee you didn't spend on the house.

The two options

Compare the same home, bought or rented.

%
%
yrs
More assumptions
yrs
%
%
%
%
%
%
After 15 years

If you buy
If you rent
Break-even
When buying pulls ahead

Net worth, either way

Both paths spend exactly the same amount each month. The renter invests whatever the buyer is paying above the rent — so what you are comparing is where the money ends up, not how much of it there is. Hover, or focus the chart and use the arrow keys.

Show the year-by-year numbers

What each option costs you each month

Buying starts more expensive and stays flat; rent starts cheaper and climbs. The year the orange line crosses is when renting stops being the cheaper monthly option.

Show the year-by-year numbers
How this is worked out

The assumptions, stated plainly.

What makes this a fair comparison

  • Both paths spend the same money. This is the whole trick. The renter starts by investing what the buyer spent on the down payment and the stamp duty, and then every month invests the difference between the buyer's outflow and the rent. When rent eventually overtakes the EMI, the renter draws that shortfall back out of the portfolio. Neither side is quietly allowed to spend less.
  • Buying net worth = property value − outstanding loan − cost of selling. The selling cost is subtracted at every point on the chart, not just at the end, so the line always answers "what would I walk away with if I sold today".
  • Renting net worth = the portfolio. Nothing else — a renter owns no property.
  • Ownership costs scale with the property's value, not the original price, since maintenance and property tax generally track the asset.
  • No tax anywhere. No relief on loan interest or principal, no capital gains on the sale of the house, and none on the renter's portfolio. In jurisdictions with generous mortgage interest relief this understates the case for buying; capital gains on the investment portfolio pushes the other way.
  • Appreciation and returns are smooth. Property is the less liquid and less diversified of the two assets, and its price is far harder to observe honestly than a portfolio's. A percentage point of assumed appreciation swings the answer a long way — try it.
  • The things this cannot price. Security of tenure, the freedom to renovate, not being asked to move, the discipline a forced monthly payment imposes, the cost and disruption of moving every few years. They belong in the decision; they just aren't numbers.

An illustration, not property or investment advice. Nothing you type is sent anywhere — the whole thing runs in your browser.

Common questions

What single number decides this?

The rent-to-price ratio — annual rent divided by the property price, shown above as the rental yield. It sets how much the renter has spare to invest each month. Where yields are low, renting frees up a lot of money and buying has to make it back on appreciation alone. Where yields are high, the buyer's outflow is barely above the rent, there is little left to invest, and buying wins quickly.

The second decider is the gap between property appreciation and your investment return. Property is a leveraged bet, so a small appreciation edge goes further than it looks — but leverage cuts both ways.

How long do I need to stay for buying to make sense?

Long enough to earn back the buying and selling costs, which together are often a tenth of the price. That is the single most common mistake: buying with a three-year horizon. Set "how long you'll stay" to three years and look at the gap — the transaction costs alone usually settle it.

Isn't rent just money down the drain?

Rent buys you somewhere to live for a year, the same way loan interest buys you the use of someone else's money. Neither builds equity. On a long loan the interest paid in the early years is often close to the rent on the same property — and unlike rent, it comes with stamp duty, maintenance and a large illiquid position in a single asset on one street.

Buying can absolutely be the better decision. It is just not automatically the better decision, which is what the phrase implies.

Where does this fit with the rest of my finances?

A house is usually the largest single position anyone holds, and a loan is usually the largest liability. Zinfai tracks both — property as an asset, the loan as a liability — so your net worth reflects them, and the FIRE engine accounts for the debt you are still servicing. See how tracking works.